Comments on: The Human Centipede II: A BBFC Update http://newempressmagazine.com/2011/06/the-human-centipede-ii-a-bbfc-update/ The film magazine that breaks convention Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:41:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1 By: barry j http://newempressmagazine.com/2011/06/the-human-centipede-ii-a-bbfc-update/#comment-420 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:36:41 +0000 http://newempressmagazine.com/?p=1031#comment-420 the bbfc is *still* one of the top5 censorers of similar countries.. of recent times..
you would have thought in 2011 they wouldn’t ban very much (less than 30 videos a year of all videos made everywhere) if it was sent for ‘classification’..

]]>
By: Graham Denison http://newempressmagazine.com/2011/06/the-human-centipede-ii-a-bbfc-update/#comment-419 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:46:51 +0000 http://newempressmagazine.com/?p=1031#comment-419 Personally I do not like this type of film, I go to the cinema to be entertained with audio/visual chewing gum.
But I do defend a person’s right to watch whatever they want.
After all it is just a film and the effects are just that, effects, however repellent they may be. I just feel
sorry for the actors being fastened ‘mouth to arse’, not nice.
The BBFC can be advisor’s, but I don’t think their remit should allow outright banning. Perhaps a new
classification of “Gross” would be in order.
Unfortunately it’s done wonders for the film’s publicity and created an audience that wouldn’t have existed if
the BBFC had given it a rating.
I for one won’t be going to see it.

]]>